Back to Archive

Wiser Trader Stocks and Options Newsletter

Issue No. 14 – February 21, 2005                       James A. Andrews                          Systems@WiserTrader.com

 

 

1.0 Modeling

 

      This is not really a math newsletter.  It’s simply that profit and loss models are important to us as traders.  In last week’s newsletter a model was introduced with the title “Precision Money Management”.  It was designed to model a natural relationship between trading system performance, trade position size, stop loss settings and profit goals. After studying the model the past week, I’d like to follow up with an interesting observation.  

 

      In brief, the model consists of two equations,

 

      FP = FC FG + (1 – FC) FL                                                                                                    (1)

 

      FP = DG / (C N)                                                                                                                 (2)

     

Where,

      FP is the average fractional profit for N trades that each uses an average amount of capital C

      FC is the fraction of trades chosen in the correct direction

      FG is the average fractional gain for NG winning trades

      FL is the average fractional loss for NL losing trades

      DG is the profit goal that one sets, expressed in dollars

 

      The model is based on average values of historical trading system performance and is only applicable when a trading system is consistently followed.  The model should not be applied to unstructured trading across a variety of instruments requiring varying trading techniques.  Each trading system or technique generates a unique set of statistics to which this methodology can be applied on an individual basis.  For a more detailed explanation, please refer to the web page Precision Money Management.  Details are also in last week’s newsletter.

 

      Last week it was seen how the model can be used to set precise profit goals and meet them with proper stop loss settings and position size.  Looking at equation (2), one can view the profit goal DG as a simple multiple of the average capital per trade C because both DG and C are considered constant for any given series of N trades.  When the profit goal is set equal to the average amount of each trade, DG  and  C  both  drop  out  of  the  equation  and  N  becomes  the number of trades needed to earn a profit equal to the average trade size.  Equation (2) then becomes, FP = 1/ N. 

 

 

© 2005 WiserTrader.com, LLC.  Members of wisertrader.com are neither licensed brokers nor licensed advisors.   Trades discussed represent trades made by the editor for the wisertrader.com portfolio.  The newsletter and web site are for information only and should not be considered as personal advice.   While it is believed that the posted information is factual, mistakes can be made in transcription.  Investors should trade stocks only after verifying all information and consulting with a licensed broker or adviser

 

      More to the point, N = 1/ FP, an important conclusion.  It says that the number of trades needed to earn an amount equal to the average trade size is 1/ FP.

 

      A chart of N = 1/ FP is plotted in Figure 1. 

 

 

 

FIGURE 1

 

 

      When the average number of trades is identified over a fixed amount of time, the chart in Figure 1 gives the rate that C worth of profit can be obtained using a fixed average trading size C.  The chart shows that when FP is less than about 0.1, the number of trades required to earn the average traded amount grows exponentially.  When a trading system’s performance is improved by increasing FP from 0.1 to 0.2, the number of required trades is cut in half from 10 to 5.  An FP of 0.5 requires only two trades.  While increasing FP above 0.5 may improve one’s odds for success, it does not substantially reduce the number of required trades to meet a given profit goal.  These details are useful and are based on the easiest trading system parameter to obtain, FP, which defines overall trading system performance.

 

      Experienced traders typically do not set profit targets because there has not been a clear relationship between profits and trading methods until now.  Typically they hunker down and use position sizing and stop loss settings and resign profit results to the mercy of whatever statistical gods there might be.  For example, the best traders will advise that you use no more than 4% of your capital for any given trade and set your trailing stop at -25% so that you can lose no more than 1% of your portfolio on any single trade.  Stop losses are tightened once a profit is shown on paper so as not to allow a winning trade to turn into a losing one.  These methods produce the desired results, that is, to retain profits, minimize losses and maximize one’s chances of living to trade another day.  But somehow one lacks a sense of control and the ability to see where profits are headed.   The above profit-loss model simply removes the blind folds.

1.1 Perspectives and Short Takes

 


Capital Gains

 

      In the microcosm of our day to day short term option trading, we need to be aware that taking short term profits carries with it a higher tax on capital gains if we compare it with holding winning trades for the long term.  Even with options we can buy leaps and hold them for the amount of time needed to qualify for long term capital gains and a lower tax rate.  This could be a mute point.  Brokers report the sale of stocks to the IRS but do not report the sale of options. The IRS refuses option sales information because options are not securities. 

 

Market Value

 

      Most of us are aware that a company’s stock is fairly valued when its price to book and price to sales ratios are less than or equal to one.  Arnold Van Den Berg of Century Management observes that the ratio of the value of the entire stock market to the U.S. Gross Domestic Product has historically averaged 0.76 over the last 40 years.  Today it is 1.36.  Jeremy Grantham, manager of GMO, an $80 billion hedge fund, cites that the fair value of the S&P500 is around 700 compared to its 1200 level today.  He sites historical evidence implying that before the market ultimately bottoms within the next 2 years, the PE ratio for the S&P500 must drop from a present value of 21 to around 12.25.

 

 

Gold

 

      We have seen the US dollar price of gold increase by 40.5% over the last five years.  This was mainly due to a fall in the value of the US dollar due to deficit spending and a negative balance of trade.  But in terms of Euro dollars, the price of gold has not budged.  It only increased by 5.8%.  However, the inability of European governments to avoid deficit spending and stay within agreed upon budgets will cause the Euro to fall in a manner similar to that seen by the US dollar.  When that happens, the price of gold, it is estimated by some, will surge to $3,000 an ounce over the next 10 years.  This trend will also be driven by the propensity for Asia Pacific populations to own personal gold and a growing movement among Muslim countries to base their currencies on gold.  All of this will intensify effects of an already reduced capacity for gold production. 

 

Oil

 

      Oil production capacity today is only about 2 million barrels a day (2.44%) more than consumption.  New discoveries are rare, existing oil fields are becoming depleted and capacity has just about peaked.  Oil prices are expected to move to $100 a barrel as India and China increase demand while supplies begin to decrease.


1.2 Option Alerts


 

Alert No. 4

 

      The remaining open alert, KBH July 115 Calls (alert no. 4) recovered somewhat from the shock and bandwagon effect of analysts suddenly realizing that real estate prices will not rise forever. The Home Building Industry was downgraded by Smith Barney and Citigroup last Friday in addition to numerous advisories echoing the sentiment. The Home Construction Index bottomed out on Tuesday, a little earlier than expected.  But it is not yet out of the woods, still well beneath its high for the year.  The option was sold at $10.40, -6.3% below the maximum buy price.  This brings the average alert profit to 5.7% per trade for a total of 4 trades.  A profit of 5.95%, compounded monthly, is needed to arrive at 100% profit for the year.  The first month’s operations end on February 28th.

 

Alert No. 5 - was closed.   There are no alerts today.  There could be one this week in energy, healthcare or basic materials. 

 

1.3 Trading & Advising versus Trading Systems

 


      A subscriber and fellow engineer recently asked, “If traders are successful, why do they advise?”  It is a valid question that I had often asked myself.  There are many possible reasons.  Here are just a few.  It is far easier to teach others how to manage risk than it is to endure risk by oneself.  Another reason for teaching is to leverage one’s knowledge.  Multiple streams of income are far better than having only one.  A third is that trading may not fully support one’s life style. Successful trading does not necessarily make one rich.

 

Hunter-Traders

 

      I often view traders as hunters.  My website was set up to market hunting tools in the form of stock filters and trading systems because I believe in their use.  I’m finding that only a very small percentage of traders will invest in these tools even though they are a sound investment.  This is somewhat mysterious because the small 12% percent of traders who are successful (again, not necessarily rich) is very close to the small percentage using trading systems.  Most traders are individualists, as we have to be to get involved in such a risky venture as short term trading.   We don’t mind being shown what and where, especially if the information is free.  This is viewed as an abundance of game.  Natural hunting instincts tell us that if game is plentiful then there is nothing more to be concerned about, at least for now.  We are less interested in the habits of our quarry and are hesitant to pay for information on how and why, choosing to learn from personal experience.  It is not until the supply of game decreases that we really begin to notice how important it is to understand the habits of our game.  After being independent for so long it becomes a matter of pride.  Then it’s even harder to submit to instructions that others provide, even when it’s free.  After ammunition (capital) has dwindled with only a few shots remaining, we sometimes submit to instruction with the highest demand that each scrap of information be perfect.  Of course, this is a formula for disappointment. 

 

How Things Have Evolved

 

      As traders, we need to become convinced that we can sharply improve our methods before reaching a point of desperation.  I thought that by providing portfolio examples of how a simple low cost trading system can be used to make profits, more traders would see the value of investing in a low cost trading system.  After all, we’re averaging 11% per trade.  However, I am slowly becoming convinced that the majority of traders will always prefer tips rather than employ the means to develop tips on their own.  The watch list pages were created to provide free tips.  Traffic to these pages has become, by far, the largest traffic on the web site. 

 

Where Things Are Now

 

      Since bills need to be paid, this led me to announce an option alert service that provides focused tips and trade timing, eventually for a fee.  I am not quite sure where that falls in the hunter-trader analogy but that is where things stand today.  The latest pricing is posted on the site.

 

Where Things are Likely to Go

 

      It is difficult to conclude that, after association with this site, traders do not see value in the consistency of trading systems.  I believe they just need to be given more incentive to take the leap.  As an affiliate merchant, I have little pricing flexibility other than to provide the broadest possible range of pricing and types of systems.

 

      There is another approach.  Most traders like to think they are already using a trading system, even though they are not keeping records of their trades and their methods evolve continuously.  What would be more appealing to the independent nature of traders than an opportunity to be shown how to develop their methods into a true trading system?  What if traders were given the opportunity to take a 7 hour web based training seminar on how to develop a trading system taught by former members of the Chicago Board of Trade having a combined 32 years experience?  What if they received the training at a sizeable discount? 

 

      According to the instructors, immediately after the seminar, the student will be able to: (1) trade using  his own trading system developed during the class (2) evaluate every kind of trading system, if necessary (3) identify profitable trading systems from scam systems and (4) have a system that fits his financial goals.

 

      I will be working to arrange the best price possible.  Seminars are given monthly with the first one occurring on February 27th from 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM.  They have announced that prices will increase after that.  I don’t know if that is an advertising statement but even at the regular price, I think the course is worth looking into.  I doubt if arrangements will be completed before their next seminar, though. I will contact you when something firm happens.

 

      To help with the negotiations, if I could say how many traders were just potentially interested, this would clarify the kind of discount we could receive.  So I am asking anyone who is interested in developing his own trading system to send me an email by simply clicking on this link to show a potential interest in the seminar.  Remember, this is not a commitment to sign up, just an indication of potential interest. – Thanks.


 

2.0 Market Analysis

 

      A redistribution of large fund holdings and surprisingly low interest rates for long term bonds in the face of rising inflation and rising short term interest rates has led me to take a shorter term view of industry leadership in Table 1 below. 

 

 

            Table 1

 Market Summary

 Week ending 02/19/05:
 
 Major Indices:
 Dow Jones     -0.1%
 NASDAQ        -0.9%
 S&P500 Index  -0.3%
 Russell 2000  -0.7%
 
 Industry Leaders
 For the Past Week
 Pipelines  
 Nonferrous Metals
 Integrated Oil & Gas
 Steel  
 Industrial Metals
 Oil & Gas Producers
 Forestry
 General Mining
 Oil & Gas
 Aluminum
 
 Industry Leaders
 For the Past Month
 Integrated Oil & Gas  
 Oil & Gas Producers
 Exploration & Production
 Heavy Construction
 Oil & Gas
 Steel
 Coal
 Pipelines 
 Marine Transportation
 Oil Equipment, Services & Dis.
 
 Gold for the past 30 days:
 USD    +1.04%
 CAD    +1.58%
 CHF    +0.82%
 GBP    -0.34%
 EUR    +0.67%
 JPY    +3.98%
 
 30 Year Bond 4.6%
 10 Year Note 4.26%
 
 

      The aggregate increase in operating earnings for the S&P 500 now looks to come in near 20%.  That’s on top of a 28% gain in the fourth quarter last year.  The number of companies guiding earnings estimates lower has increased significantly from recent quarters. This has the market concerned that earnings growth will slow to 5% to 7% in the first quarter. The market is also concerned about rising inflation and rising interest rates.  When bond yields rise high enough, bonds begin to look more attractive than risky over-priced stocks.  The 5 day and 5 week RSI for the DOW, S&P500 and the NASDAQ are all neutral.  Other sentiment indicators are given in Table 2.

 

Table 2

Sentiment Indicators 02/19/05

Sentiment Indicator

Value

Last Week

2 Weeks Ago

Complacent

Cautious

VIX

11.18

11.43

11.21

< 20

> 50

VXN

17.87

17.19

16.92

< 30

> 80

Put/Call Ratio

0.594

0.660

0.486

< 0.6

> 0.7

%Bulls - %Bears

35.4

31.4%

29.2%

> 29%

< 25%

 

3.0 Procedure

 

      The following stock screens were generated with tools from AAII.  The short term trading filter used for Table 3a looks for optionable stocks whose percentage relative strength over the past 6 months is greater than 90%, EPS Growth over the past 12 months is greater than 80% and are within 5% of their 52 week  high  with  a  minimum  price  of  $50.   When a trigger has been received, call or put options are supplied depending on the direction of trend as reflected by the respective positive or negative slope of the 30 day SMA. 

 

Table 3a

Short Term Options (Original Stock Candidate Filter) as of   02/19/05

Stock

Company

Sector

Industry

OPTION

Key

AAPL

Apple Computer, Inc.

Technology

Computer Hardware

-

 +T

AEOS

American Eagle Outfitters

Services

Retail (Apparel)

AQU HK AUG 55.00 CALL

 +TTC

AET

Aetna Inc.

Financial

Insurance (Accident & Health)

-

 +T

ATW

Atwood Oceanics, Inc.

Energy

Oil Well Services & Equipment

-

 +T

BTU

Peabody Energy Corporation

Energy

Coal

-

 +T

BYD

Boyd Gaming Corporation

Services

Casinos & Gaming

-

 +T

CLF

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Basic Materials

Metal Mining

CLF GN JUL 70.00 CALL

 +TT

CME

Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings

Financial

Investment Services

-

0

CRS

Carpenter Technology Corp

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

-

 +T

FFIV

F5 Networks Inc.

Technology

Computer Networks

-

 +T

GGC

Georgia Gulf Corporation

Basic Materials

Chemicals - Plastics and Rubbers

-

0

KMRT

Kmart Holding Corporation

Services

Retail (Department & Discount)

-

0

MDC

M.D.C. Holdings, Inc.

Capital Goods

Construction Services

-

 +T

MGG

MGM MIRAGE

Services

Casinos & Gaming

-

 +T

MON

Monsanto Company

Basic Materials

Chemical Manufacturing

-

 +T

PCO

Premcor Inc.

Energy

Oil & Gas Operations

-

 +T

POT

Potash Corp./Saskatchewan (USA)

Basic Materials

Non-Metallic Mining

-

 +T

SIE

Sierra Health Services, Inc.

Financial

Insurance (Accident & Health)

-

 +T

SWN

Southwestern Energy Company

Energy

Oil & Gas Operations

-

 +T

TXI

Texas Industries, Inc.

Capital Goods

Construction - Raw Materials

-

 +T

TXU

TXU Corporation

Utilities

Electric Utilities

-

 +T

VLO

Valero Energy Corp.

Energy

Oil & Gas Operations

-

 +T

X

United States Steel Corp.

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

-

0

 

 

Key

Open Trade

Passed Recent Filter

“0” =  no trend

"+T" = positive trend

"-T" = negative trend

"TT" = trigger received

"TTC" = confirmation received

 

 

      The stock filter resulting in Table 3b is for the potential to write covered call options.  The only difference between filters for Tables 3a and 3b is that in 3b the maximum stock price is $20. 

 

Table 3b

Short Term Covered Call Writing Screen as of   02/19/05

 

Stock

Company

Sector

Industry

Covered Calls

Key

AKS

AK Steel Holding Corporation

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

-

 +T

BEV

Beverly Enterprises

Health Care

Healthcare Facilities

-

 +T

MDRX

Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc.

Technology

Software & Programming

MXQ CV MAR 12.5 CALL

 +GAP-V

MXT

Metris Companies Inc.

Financial

Consumer Financial Services

-

0

OS

Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

-

 +T

PNK

Pinnacle Entertainment

Services

Casinos & Gaming

PNK CW MAR 17.50 CALL

 -TTC

SGR

The Shaw Group Inc.

Basic Materials

Misc. Fabricated Products

-

 +T

SID

Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (ADR)

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

-

 +T

SIGM

Sigma Designs, Inc.

Technology

Computer Peripherals

-

 +T

TIWI

Telesystem International Wireless (USA)

Services

Communications Services

-

 +T

WITS

Witness Systems, Inc.

Technology

Software & Programming

UPJ CD MAR 20.00 CALL

 +TT

XXIA

Ixia

Technology

Electronic Instruments & Controls

-

 +T

 

 

 

 

      For the screen in Table 3c, the number of selections is reduced by eliminating stocks having P/E’s greater than 30.  

 

 

 

Table 3c

Growth Momentum (Intermediate Term) Screen as of   02/19/05

Stock

Company

Sector

Industry

BSTE

Biosite Incorporated

Health Care

Biotechnology & Drugs

ELBO

Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp.

Services

Retail (Technology)

KBH

KB Home

Capital Goods

Construction Services

MT

Mittal Steel Company N.V. (ADR)

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

MTH

Meritage Homes Corporation

Capital Goods

Construction Services

ODFL

Old Dominion Freight Line

Transportation

Trucking

PHM

Pulte Homes, Inc.

Capital Goods

Construction Services

PTRY

The Pantry, Inc.

Services

Retail (Grocery)

SPF

Standard Pacific Corp.

Capital Goods

Construction Services

USNA

USANA Health Sciences, Inc.

Consumer Non-Cyclical

Personal & Household Products

VIVO

Meridian Bioscience, Inc.

Health Care

Biotechnology & Drugs

 

 

 

      For the Peter Lynch screen in Table 3d, again the number of selections for this screen is reduced by eliminating stocks having P/E’s greater than 30.   

 

 

Table 3d

Peter Lynch Value (Intermediate Term) Screen as of   02/19/05

Stock

Company

Sector

Industry

BLSC

Bio-Logic Systems Corp.

Health Care

Medical Equipment & Supplies

CAJ

Canon Inc. (ADR)

Technology

Computer Peripherals

CSLMF

Consolidated Mercantile (USA)

Basic Materials

Containters & Packaging

GGB

Gerdau S.A. (ADR)

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

IMY

Grupo IMSA S.A. de C.V. (ADR)

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

KEP

Korea Electric Power Corporation (ADR)

Utilities

Electric Utilities

MBT

Mobile TeleSystems OJSC (ADR)

Services

Communications Services

MKTAY

Makita Corporation (ADR)

Consumer Cyclical

Appliances & Tools

NOLD

Noland Company

Capital Goods

Misc. Capital Goods

PCU

Southern Peru Copper Corp (USA)

Basic Materials

Metal Mining

SHI

Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co. (ADR)

Energy

Oil & Gas Operations

SKM

SK Telecom Co., Ltd. (ADR)

Services

Communications Services

TM

Toyota Motor Corporation (ADR)

Consumer Cyclical

Auto & Truck Manufacturers

TMIC

Trend Micro Incorporated (ADR)

Technology

Software & Programming

UGP

Ultrapar Participacoes SA (ADR)

Energy

Oil & Gas Operations

VLCCF

Knightsbridge Tankers Limited

Transportation

Water Transportation

 

 

      The filter for Warren Buffet style stock picking in Table 3e is for the intermediate to long term.  Two requirements were added.  One was to include only optionable stocks in order to find LEAPS opportunities.  The other requirement was to include only those stocks having a PE of 17 or less. 

 

Table 3e

Warren Buffett Value (Long Term) Screen as of   02/19/05

Stock

Company

Sector

Industry

Leaps

ABFS

Arkansas Best Corporation

Transportation

Trucking

 

COLM

Columbia Sportswear Company

Consumer Cyclical

Apparel/Accessories

-

DHI

D.R. Horton Inc.

Capital Goods

Construction Services

VEI AH JAN07 40.00 CALL

DSPG

DSP Group, Inc.

Technology

Communications Equipment

 

ELBO

Electronics Boutique Holdings Corp.

Services

Retail (Technology)

-

FDP

Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc.

Consumer Non-Cyclical

Crops

VKZ AF JAN07 30.00 CALL

FNF

Fidelity National Financial

Financial

Insurance (Property & Casualty)

VWJ AJJAN07 50.00 CALL

HELE

Helen of Troy Limited

Consumer Cyclical

Appliances & Tools

ODI AG JAN07 35.00 CALL

HOV

Hovnanian Enterprises

Capital Goods

Construction Services

-

HRH

Hilb, Rogal & Hobbs Company

Financial

Insurance (Miscellaneous)

-

LNCR

Lincare Holdings Inc.

Health Care

Healthcare Facilities

OUN AI JAN07 45.00 CALL

NFB

North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.

Financial

Regional Banks

OUN AH JAN07 40.00 CALL

NUE

Nucor Corporation

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

VUB AK JAN07 55.00 CALL

PGR

The Progressive Corp.

Financial

Insurance (Property & Casualty)

-

STLD

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

Basic Materials

Iron & Steel

-

SU

Suncor Energy Inc. (USA)

Energy

Oil & Gas - Integrated

-

VLCCF

Knightsbridge Tankers Limited

Transportation

Water Transportation

-

THO

Thor Industries, Inc.

Capital Goods

Mobile Homes & RVs

-

 

 

      The stocks from Benjamin Graham’s style of utility investing are listed in Table 3f.  A requirement was added to include only those stocks having a PE of 17 or less.  

 

Table 3f

Benjamin Graham Value (Long Term) Screen as of   02/19/05

Stock

Company

Sector

Industry

BKH

Black Hills Corporation

Utilities

Electric Utilities

DTE

DTE Energy Company

Utilities

Electric Utilities

KEP

Korea Electric Power Corporation (ADR)

Utilities

Electric Utilities

NFG

National Fuel Gas Co.

Utilities

Natural Gas Utilities

PGN

Progress Energy, Inc.

Utilities

Electric Utilities

PNM

PNM Resources, Inc.

Utilities

Electric Utilities

PNW

Pinnacle West Capital

Utilities

Electric Utilities

SRE

Sempra Energy

Utilities

Natural Gas Utilities

WPS

WPS Resources Corp

Utilities

Electric Utilities

 

 

4.0 Results

4.1 Filter Development

 

      The goal for filter development is to use the stock candidate filters to buy call options and write covered calls in rising and sideways markets, a use for which they seem entirely suited.  The experimental down-market filter is to be used for buying put options in declining and sideways markets.  Essential features of the 3 filters are described in Table 4a.

 

 

Table 4a

Filter Criteria

 

Description

(1) Stock Candidate

(2) Stock Candidate

(3) 2nd Down-mkt

Purpose

Buy Calls & Puts

Write Covered Calls

Buy Put Options

Market direction

All

All

Down, Sideways

Price

> $50

< $20

> $30

12 m EPS growth

> 80%

> 80%

< 20%

Relative Strength

26 wk >90%

26 wk >90%

26 wk < 20%

Price within

5% of 52wk high

5% of 52wk high

5% of 52 wk low

Exchanges

NASDAQ, NYSE

NASDAQ, NYSE

NASDAQ, NYSE

 

 

 

      The relative average filter performance for the three groups of filtered stocks is compared with proxies for the major averages in Table 4b.  Filter 1 stocks are those listed in Table 3a and filter 2 stocks are listed in table 3b.  Filter 3 stocks, for the experimental filter, are listed in Table 4c.  It is encouraging to see that Filter 3 stocks were consistently lower than those for the Filters 1 and 2.   The experiment continues.

 

 

 

Table 4b

Average Filter Performance as of 02/19/05

 

Instrument

Past month

1 Week ago

2 weeks ago

3 weeks ago

4 weeks ago

SPY

3.1%

-0.3%

0.4%

2.4%

0.6%

DIA

3.8%

-0.3%

1.0%

2.5%

0.6%

QQQQ

0.8%

-0.9%

-0.1%

2.2%

-0.4%

Filter 1 > $50

13.5%

2.3%

2.0%

6.7%

1.9%

Filter 2 < $20

19.6%

4.9%

1.0%

8.4%

4.2%

Filter 3 > $30

-1.8%

-0.3%

-0.5%

0.6%

-1.6%

 

 

 

      Stocks selected by the revised experimental down-market filter are listed in Table 4c.  This filter looks for stocks having the potential to decline in a down market.  They are optionable stocks priced above $30 having less than 20% year over year EPS growth, a 26 week %Rank Relative Strength of less than 20% and within 5% of their 52 week lows. 

 

 

 

Table 4c

Experimental Down-Market Filter as of   02/19/05

Stock

Company

Sector

Industry

OPTION

Key

BUD

Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

Consumer Non-Cyclical

Beverages (Alcoholic)

-

 -T

ETM

Entercom Communications Corp.

Services

Broadcasting & Cable TV

-

0

FITB

Fifth Third Bancorp

Financial

Regional Banks

-

0

GM

General Motors Corporation

Consumer Cyclical

Auto & Truck Manufacturers

-

0

IP

International Paper Company

Basic Materials

Paper & Paper Products

-

 -T

MIL

Millipore Corporation

Technology

Scientific & Technical Instruments

-

 -T

MTG

MGIC Investment Corp.

Financial

Insurance (Property & Casualty)

-

 -T

NBIX

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Health Care

Biotechnology & Drugs

-

 -T

NYT

The New York Times Co.

Services

Printing & Publishing

NYT SH JUL 40.00 PUT

 -TTC

SSP

The E.W. Scripps Company

Services

Printing & Publishing

SSP RI JUN 45.00 PUT

 -TTC

TECH

Techne Corporation

Health Care

Biotechnology & Drugs

-

 -T

 

 

 

 


4.2 Portfolio Trades

 

      KBH was discussed in Section 1.2.

 

      MON, TOL and BZH call option positions in Table 4d were exited for 2.5, 2.8 and 15.8% profit, respectively.

 

Table 4d

Option Portfolio Trading History as of 02/19/05
 

Stock

Buy Date

Buy Price

Last

Action

P/L(%)

Option

URBN

11/23

$11.50

$9.00

Sold 11/30

-21.7%

JUN 35.00 CALL

TXU

11/23

$11.30

$6.30

Sold 12/2

-44.2%

APR 55.00 CALL

USG

11/23

$8.40

$12.80

Sold 12/15

52.4%

MAY 25.00 CALL

ADSK

12/20

$8.20

$9.20

Sold 12/23

12.2%

ADQ GN JUL 70.00 CALL

MON

12/20

$3.80

$4.80

Sold 12/23

26.3%

MON GJ JUL 50.00 CALL

POT

12/20

$7.00

$8.00

Sold 12/23

14.3%

POT FP JUN 80.00 CALL

TXI

12/20

$5.50

$9.00

Sold 12/23

63.6%

TXI GL JUL 60.00 CALL

AET

1/7

$5.70

$7.10

Sold 01/19

24.6%

AET GX JUL 135.00 CALL

CLF

1/7

$7.30

$9.20

Sold 01/19

26.0%

CLF GJ JUL 50.00 CALL  

MTH

1/21

$6.80

$9.20

Sold 02/01

35.3%

MTH FZ JUN 62.50 CALL  

BZH

1/31

$13.70

$17.30

Sold 02/01

26.3%

BZH HJ AUG 150.00 CALL

KBH

1/31

$9.20

$11.10

Sold 02/01

20.7%

KBH GU JUL 110.00 CALL

BHP

1/28

$2.25

$2.70

Sold 02/01

20.0%

BHP HE AUG 25.00 CALL

X

1/25

$5.30

$4.90

Sold 02/02

-7.5%

X GK JUL 55.00 CALL

SFI

1/24

$0.75

$0.30

Sold 02/04

-60.0%

SFI PH APR 40.00 PUT

EBAY

2/7

$6.80

$5.60

Sold 02/08

-17.6%

XBA SO JUL 75.00 PUT

CCJ

2/4

$6.60

$10.20

Sold 02/11

54.5%

CCJ IG SEP 35.00 CALL

MON

2/4

$8.00

$8.20

Sold  02/15

2.5%

MON GJ JUL 50.00 CALL

TOL

1/2

$7.10

$7.30

Sold 02/17

2.8%

TOL IR SEP 90.00 CALL

BZH

2/9

$14.60

$16.90

Sold 02/17

15.8%

BZH HN AUG 170.00 CALL

KBH

2/7

$11.10

$10.40

Sold 02/18

-6.3%

KBH GC JUL 115.00 CALL

 

 

 

5.0 Conclusion

     

      According to the historical portfolio, the trading system performance parameters continue to be stable.

 

      Average fractional profit for 21 trades, FP = 11.4% per trade.

      Fraction of trades chosen in the correct direction, FC = 71.4%

      Average fractional gain for 15 winning trades, FG = 26.48% per trade.

      Average fractional loss for 6 losing trades, FL = -26.25% per trade.

 

 

 

 

Appendix

Investment Conference Schedule

     Some of the finest investment ideas can be introduced and catch fire at conferences.  Below are links to conference registration sites where you can sign up.  

 

Conference Search

 

 

Back to Archive