
______________________________________________________________________________
Issue No. 39 – August 15, 2005 Prescott, Arizona Systems@WiserTrader.com
______________________________________________________________________________
Below describes how an unattended sell order can induce an under priced options premium.
The title of this could be “How Not to Sell an Options Contract”. It involves a recent experience I had while holding a call option in a rising market. The level 2 screen showed that most traders had their order prices programmed, no matter which exchange they were trading. They had at least two criteria for submitting and modifying bid and asking prices. One was to modify submitted prices as function of the option’s intrinsic value or the theoretical fair value. Another was to always bid a fixed amount below the lowest asking price, possibly to insure getting in at a bargain. Likewise, sellers were obliged to always submit asking prices a minimum fixed amount above the highest bid, no doubt to make sure they were not selling the contract too cheaply. The result is a constant bid-ask spread that slides upward and downward as the underlying stock price moves in either direction. It is fascinating to see this “dance” operate like clock work, although it can be rather frustrating and appear as a mystifying game at first.
While waiting to sell my single call contract, the underlying stock began to rise sharply and continually. As I watched the bid-ask prices move upward, I got my sell order prepared and had my finger ready on the keyboard. Lo and behold, I noticed a single contract sell order that did not move up in price as the underlying stock price continued to rise. It seems that one intrepid trader decided he had had enough of the bid-ask “dance” and decided to just enter his sell order at a fixed price and leave it there until executed. Other seller’s prices continued to rise with the underlying. But when bid prices neared the fixed seller’s price, they suddenly backed away, even as the underlying stock price continued to rise. You could tell these buy orders were preprogrammed. And obviously the solitary fixed asking price seller had entered his sell order and walked away from the computer. I waited the rest of the trading session for this impasse to resolve itself. But it did not that day. The closing bid for the day remained the same amount below the now under priced fixed asking price while the underlying stock and all the other asking prices had advanced to astronomical levels.
© 2005 Desert Mountain Systems, LLC. Members of wisertrader.com are neither licensed brokers nor licensed advisors. Trades discussed represent recommendations made by the editor for the wisertrader.com portfolio. The newsletter and web site are for information only and should not be considered as personal advice. While it is believed that the posted information is factual, mistakes can be made in transcription. Investors should trade stocks only after verifying all information and consulting with a licensed broker or adviser. Desert Mountain Systems markets third party trading systems but has no other affiliation with trading system companies.
It is well established that one should not post large stop orders where market makers can see them because of the temptation posed to gun for the stops. This occurs routinely in the Forex markets. As order processing becomes more automated it may become less of a problem. Yet automation with programmed order adjustments can present some unexpected nuances of their own. One solution might be to use text messaging from a broker, to a pager, email or cell phone, to inform you when a price or bid has reached a target level. Once the target is reached then you can look at the situation directly and decide if you want to place a sell order or hold off for a better price. Placing an unattended order may have unintended consequences when programmable order adjustment software is taken into account.
The Fed policy statement this week really brought nothing new to the market. The stock market improvement is mostly attributable to the continued impact of the bullish underlying factors of strong profit growth and an accelerating economy. The outlook for the market remains highly uncertain. It is a surprised that it has held up so well in the face of the surge in oil prices. August is typically a weak month for the market and the market very well could be in for some choppy action through the end of this month. The week ahead brings the CPI and PPI reports, as well as industrial production data, but the earnings calendar is light. Figure 1 compares index tracking stocks for the major averages with Sector SPDR’s.
.

FIGURE 1
Relative strength is given in Table 2A.
Table 2A
Relative Strength Index
|
|
5 Day RSI |
|
DOW |
Neutral |
|
S&P 500 |
Neutral |
|
NASDAQ |
Neutral |
Market sentiment is shown in Table 2B. Volatility has increased.
Table 2B
VTO Market Sentiment Indicators
|
Sentiment Indicator |
Current |
Last Week |
2 Weeks Ago |
Complacent |
Cautious |
|
VIX ** |
12.74 |
12.48 |
11.57 |
< 20 |
> 50 |
|
VXN *** |
15.63 |
15.40 |
13.87 |
< 30 |
> 70 |
|
Put/Call Ratio |
0.625 |
0.551 |
0.560 |
< 0.6 |
> 0.7 |
|
%Bulls - %Bears |
39.8% |
34.8% |
33.3% |
> 29% |
< 20% |
|
** Above 20 day SMA = Sell signal. *** Above 20 day SMA = Sell signal. |
|||||
Figure 2 compares index tracking stocks with five leading ETF’s for the week.

FIGURE 2
Industry leaders in Table 2C rank from highest to lowest.
Table 2C - Market Summary
Major Indices
For the Past Week:
Dow Jones +0.4%
NASDAQ -1.0%
S&P500 Index +0.3%
Russell 2000 -0.4%
30 Year Bond 4.441%
10 Year Note 4.238%
Industry Leaders
For the Past Week:
Water
Aluminum
Gold Mining
General Mining
Mining
Industrial Metals
Coal
Integrated Oil & Gas
Oil & Gas Producers
Steel
Industry Leaders
For the Past Month:
Coal
Water
Steel
Mining
Industrial Metals
Oil Equipment & Services
Railroads
Oil Equipment, Services & Dis
General Mining
Basic Resources
Crude Oil $66.86
Gold for the past 30 days:
USD +5.17%
CAD +4.09%
CHF +1.70%
GBP +1.63%
EUR +2.27%
JPY +2.72%
In Table 2D, the broader market moved sideways for the week.
Table 2D
Index Tracking Stocks, Key Industry ETF’s and Sector SPDR’s
|
|
1 month |
1 wk ago |
2 wks ago |
3 wks ago |
4 wks ago |
|
SPY (S&P 500) |
0.2% |
0.1% |
-0.7% |
0.2% |
0.6% |
|
DIA (DOW) |
-0.3% |
0.3% |
-0.9% |
0.1% |
0.2% |
|
QQQQ (NASDAQ 100) |
0.8% |
-0.7% |
-0.3% |
0.4% |
1.4% |
|
IWM (Russell 2000) |
-0.7% |
-0.7% |
-2.8% |
0.8% |
2.0% |
|
GLD, GOLD |
5.8% |
2.0% |
1.8% |
0.9% |
1.0% |
|
RKH, Banking |
-2.8% |
0.2% |
-1.3% |
-0.9% |
-0.8% |
|
IYT, Transportation |
2.5% |
0.5% |
-1.8% |
0.5% |
3.4% |
|
SMH, Semiconductors |
-1.7% |
-1.5% |
-1.2% |
0.4% |
0.6% |
|
BBH, Biotechnology |
2.5% |
-0.3% |
-0.3% |
1.1% |
2.0% |
|
IYR, Real Estate |
-1.9% |
-0.9% |
-4.7% |
2.4% |
1.4% |
|
OIH, Oil |
14.4% |
1.2% |
2.3% |
1.5% |
8.8% |
|
XLE, Energy |
10.6% |
3.7% |
1.7% |
0.4% |
4.5% |
|
XLU, Utilities |
-0.9% |
-0.5% |
-1.1% |
1.5% |
-0.7% |
|
XLB, Materials |
3.5% |
1.0% |
-0.2% |
-0.5% |
3.1% |
|
XLI, Industrial |
0.8% |
0.8% |
-1.6% |
0.0% |
1.6% |
|
XLK, Technology |
-1.1% |
-1.7% |
0.5% |
0.4% |
-0.3% |
|
XLV, Healthcare |
0.8% |
0.6% |
-0.6% |
1.1% |
-0.3% |
|
XLF, Financials |
-2.2% |
0.2% |
-1.0% |
-0.7% |
-0.7% |
|
XLP, Consumer Staples |
-1.2% |
-0.3% |
-1.4% |
0.9% |
-0.3% |
|
XLY, Consumer Discretionary |
1.0% |
1.0% |
-1.5% |
0.2% |
1.3% |
Key industry ETF’s are Biotech and Semiconductors which confirm the NASDAQ. Transportation confirms the Dow Jones Industrial Average according to Dow Theory. Banking and Financials are confirming indicators for the S&P 500. Gold and Real Estate are respective indicators for the inverse health of the currency and the economy in general.
The following watch lists contain stock candidates for consideration. They are not necessarily trades. Categories include check lists for insider buying and cash rich companies, as well as, those that employ stock picking methods of six important master traders.
Some of the watch lists are growing without bound, making selections difficult. Eventually it is no longer helpful to have too many choices. It was decided to limit the number of entries to 10 per category. First we attempted to eliminate stocks that were not optionable if there were at least 10 remaining. Next, we ranked them according to their past month’s performance and chose the top 10. They may not necessarily be ones that have increased the most since we began monitoring them. We continue to monitor stocks that do not rank in the top 10 as long as they meet price requirements described below. They may subsequently replace some of those currently listed.
The “Reference” is the date that a stock passed the indicated filter and was added to or returned to the list. The “% Change” is how the price has changed since the reference date. Stocks that are down 10% or more after being listed are removed. The “% from Max” is the percentage the price has declined from the maximum price reached since the reference date. Stocks that are down 8% from their highs after being listed are flagged in yellow. Stocks that are down 15% from their highs after being listed are removed. More information on filters is available on the web site.
A performance summary of filtering techniques for check lists and master trader selection methods is given in Table 3A.
Table 3A
Stock Filter Summary
|
Filter |
Avg. % Change Since Listed |
Avg. % Change Friday |
1 Month |
1 Week Ago |
2 weeks Ago |
3 Weeks Ago |
4 Weeks Ago |
|
Net Insider Buying |
12.3% |
-1.4% |
12.2% |
-0.2% |
4.3% |
3.7% |
4.1% |
|
Cash Rich Companies |
-0.4% |
-0.8% |
-5.7% |
-2.4% |
-2.5% |
1.1% |
-2.0% |
|
Growth Momentum Stocks |
7.7% |
-2.6% |
0.1% |
-2.7% |
0.8% |
1.9% |
0.3% |
|
Lynch Stocks |
8.9% |
-1.1% |
3.8% |
0.5% |
-0.1% |
2.0% |
1.4% |
|
Buffett Stocks |
15.7% |
-1.2% |
0.5% |
-2.4% |
-1.2% |
3.0% |
1.2% |
|
Graham Stocks |
10.3% |
-1.6% |
0.7% |
-1.1% |
1.1% |
0.7% |
-0.1% |
|
Templeton Stocks |
6.7% |
-1.3% |
1.2% |
-2.5% |
0.7% |
1.4% |
1.7% |
|
Zweig Stocks |
8.3% |
-2.6% |
3.5% |
-2.4% |
2.5% |
2.9% |
0.4% |
|
Average |
8.7% |
-1.6% |
2.0% |
-1.7% |
0.7% |
2.1% |
0.9% |
Key
|
Passed Recent Filter |
Companies that have experienced net insider buying within the past 6 months of 5% or more of issued stock are listed in Table 3B. These stocks should also appear in one of the master trader screens or meet additional screening criteria before being given serious consideration. This list is a mixture of stocks that are optionable and those that are not.
Table 3B
Net Insider Buying Check List
Best 10 for the Month
|
Stock |
Reference |
% Chg |
Company |
Sector |
Industry |
% from Max |
|
RGN |
07/01/05 |
15.9% |
RegeneRx Biopharmaceut. |
Health Care |
Biotechnology & Drugs |
-2.2% |
|
AUXL |
08/12/05 |
0.0% |
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Health Care |
Biotechnology & Drugs |
0.0% |
|
ETC |
08/12/05 |
0.0% |
Environmental Tectonics Corporation |
Technology |
Scientific & Technical Instruments |
0.0% |
|
STLW |
07/08/05 |
-0.4% |
Stratos International, Inc. |
Technology |
Semiconductors |
-2.6% |
|
KIRK |
05/27/05 |
-1.5% |
Kirkland's, Inc. |
Services |
Retail (Specialty Non-Apparel) |
-5.9% |
|
IRN |
08/05/05 |
-2.3% |
Rewards Network Inc. |
Services |
Business Services |
-2.6% |
|
ASPV |
05/27/05 |
19.3% |
Aspreva Pharmaceuticals Corporation |
Health Care |
Biotechnology & Drugs |
-3.0% |
|
ZHNE |
07/15/05 |
2.9% |
Zhone Technologies, Inc. |
Technology |
Communications Equipment |
-13.1% |
|
PCTY |
07/08/05 |
0.5% |
Party City Corporation |
Services |
Retail (Specialty Non-Apparel) |
-8.0% |
|
ATPL |
07/01/05 |
2.7% |