Ranked by
28-Period Williams %R
as of 02/20/09
*
|
Stock |
Reference Date |
% Chg |
2009 Gain |
Name |
Industry |
% off Max |
Price on |
%R1 |
%R2 |
|
2/20/09 |
|
GPN |
12/12/08 |
0.6% |
0.1% |
Global Payments Inc. |
Business Services |
-9.6% |
$32.80 |
-76 |
-79 |
Martin Zweig neither sponsors nor
endorses this information.
|
Passed Recent Filter |
|
Price declined by half of stop loss setting |
|
Oversold re Williams %R (%R2 = most
recent) |
|
Overbought
re Williams %R (%R2 = most recent) |
Martin Zweig Stock Filter
It is rare to find a purely
growth-oriented or purely value-oriented stock selection
strategy anymore; most screens only lean toward one
style or the other. Martin Zweig, who was named
stock picker of the year two years running in the 1990s
by the Hulbert Financial Digest and is chairman of the
Zweig Funds, leans toward the growth methodology. The Zweig screen is based on his
approach.
Zweig divides stock-picking into two categories-the
shotgun approach and the rifle approach. The shotgun
method, which Zweig advocates, entails screening
publicly available data on a number of stocks using
predetermined criteria. This more mechanical approach
allows individuals to follow a large number of stocks at
one time, spending a limited amount of time on any one
company. In contrast, the rifle approach involves the in-depth
analysis of a select number of companies. The analysis
may cover accounting methods used, trends in the company
and industry, and a variety of economic variables
impacting the company. Zweig points out, however, that
this approach is unrealistic for the average individual
investor because it requires full-time analysis of the
market.
Zweig requires positive
growth in earnings per share between the most recent
fiscal quarter and the same quarter the prior year. The first filter specifies that the same-quarter growth
rate in fully diluted earnings per share from continuing
operations for each of the last four fiscal quarters is
greater than zero.
Since sales drive earnings,
Zweig first requires that a company have positive growth in
sales as compared to the same quarter the prior year.
The
screen also compares the same-quarter growth rate in
sales for the last fiscal quarter to the same-quarter
growth rate in sales for the previous quarter. The screen requires
that a company's earnings per share for the last four
quarters (trailing 12 months) be greater than or equal
to the earnings per share for the last fiscal year as
well as requiring year-to-year increases in earnings per
share for each of the last two fiscal years. The screen specifies a three-year
annualized growth rate in diluted earnings per share
from continuing operations of at least 15%. The screen
implements the same sales growth requirement as for
earnings-the compounded growth rate in sales for the
last three-year period must be at least 15%. This way,
the screen seeks out companies that are growing at a
healthy clip for both earnings and sales.
The next element Zweig looks for is increasing momentum
in earnings growth, both over the short term and longer
term. Zweig compares the growth rate in earnings between
the last fiscal quarter and the same quarter one year
prior, to the growth in earnings between the sum total
of the prior three fiscal quarters and the same three
quarters one year ago. Zweig also
accepts companies whose same quarter growth rate for the
most recent quarter is at least 30%. Zweig also compares
the growth in same-quarter earnings for the last fiscal
quarter to the longer-term growth. For this element,
this screen required that the same quarter growth rate
in earnings per share be greater than the three-year
earnings per share growth rate.
The other key element of Zweig's stock selection is the
price-earnings ratio. Zweig avoids living on the edge—he
believes that a price-earnings ratio can be too high or
too low. The
price-earnings ratios constraints for the screen consist
of a minimum level of 5.0 (to avoid potentially troubled
firms) and a maximum level of one and a half times the
median price-earnings ratio of the entire universe of
stocks. The screen eliminates those companies whose price
strength relative to the S&P 500 over the last 26 weeks
has been below zero.
Remaining Criteria
To round out the screen, supplemental criteria were
applied to further ensure the integrity of the companies
we ultimately want to examine. The first of these
eliminates those companies traded as American Depositary
Receipts, or ADRs-foreign listed companies that are
traded on U.S. exchanges. The screen also excludes
companies categorized as part of the miscellaneous
financial services and real estate operations
industries, which usually consist of closed-end mutual
funds and real-estate investment trusts. Lastly, the
screen addresses the difficulty that can arise when
attempting to invest in stocks that are lacking
liquidity - they have relatively low daily trading
volume. While Zweig believes that the average investor
will not run into liquidity problems, it is a good idea
to establish a minimum level of daily trading volume.
The screen requires companies to have an average monthly
trading volume (based on the last three months) that
falls in the top 75%.
Since the level of debt a company can safely carry tends
to depend heavily on the industry in which it operates,
it is best to compare an individual company's level of
debt to that of its industry.
If prices fall
following an earnings announcement, chances are the
market's expectations were not met. Studies have shown
that, in cases such as these, the negative impact on the
stock's price could last for up to a year. It is for this reason that
Zweig chooses not to "fight the tape." He overlooks
those companies whose prices fall "significantly" on the
day the latest quarterly results are announced.
Likewise, an announcement that is better than what the
market was expecting could have a positive impact on the
stock price for a long time.
In general, Zweig is more concerned with heavy insider
selling than a lack of insider buying. Zweig uses
insider buying and selling activity over the last three
months as potential buy and sell signals-three insider
buys indicates a potential buy signal and three insider
sells, a potential sell signal. He also prefers his
signals to be unanimous, meaning at least three insider
buys and no sells for a buy signal and at least three
insider sells with no buys for a sell signal. Web sites
such as MSN MoneyCentral track insider activity over the
last three months (moneycentral.msn.com).
When following any stock screening strategy, it is
important to remember that the process is only a first
step. Martin Zweig's principles help to reveal a
collection of companies exhibiting strong earnings and
sales growth, reasonable price-earnings ratios relative
to the overall stock universe, and strong relative price
strength that can prove to be an interesting starting
point.
This
information is provided by AAII.